Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 29th Jan 2008 23:10 UTC, submitted by friendly.daemon@googlemail.com
Thread beginning with comment 298375
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Broken for 3 years ...
by BluenoseJake on Wed 30th Jan 2008 14:38
in reply to "Broken for 3 years ..."
Why should the core developers maintain something they didn't write, and are not interested in. They are concerned with writing FreeBSD.
It's the same as Ubuntu not supporting Automatix, It's useful, but it's also dangerous. If I was the FreeBSd devs, I would not support a 3rd party installation script, they have their own installer to support.
RE[2]: Broken for 3 years ...
by mwndk on Wed 30th Jan 2008 17:03
in reply to "RE: Broken for 3 years ..."
RE[2]: Broken for 3 years ...
by Oliver on Wed 30th Jan 2008 18:11
in reply to "RE: Broken for 3 years ..."





Member since:
2005-07-06
Broken for 3 years , no one to pay for it to be fixed or fix it , wil be broken at next update.
I say usual BSD ...
It seem to me , that anything that allow for easy instalation of my OS should be maintained and kept up to date by the core developers and offered on the default website and offered with the default distribution. But then I remember we are talking about BSD here.