Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 30th Jan 2008 05:31 UTC
Microsoft will have to put up with another two years of court antitrust oversight, a federal judge ruled on Tuesday. In her ruling, Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly cited the length of time it has taken Microsoft to get its protocol licensing program up and running as the primary reason she is extending the consent decree, which was due to expire at the end of last year.
Thread beginning with comment 298445
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2006-12-28
Absolutely in agreement with you on that one, and I doubt it could have been said better.
Personally, I feel that large scale corporate entities should be discouraged, full stop, in favor of more smaller companies, thereby evening out the playing field and preemptively dealing with potential monopoly situations.
Just my two cent.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-07-24
IMO, it should be standard procedure to protect competition and "We, The Poeple" by putting a watchdog on any company declared to be a monopoly. I don't care if it is Microsoft and operating systems, or Acme, Inc. and widgets. The business instincts which make for a healthy and successful "regular" company become dangerous to free competition and the common good when practiced by a player with the advantages and power of a monopoly position. The terms of the decree seem fair and reasonable to me, and should apply as long as Microsoft holds its monopoly position in that industry.
At any rate, it's nice to see that Microsoft's foot dragging regarding compliance didn't help them any.
Edited 2008-01-30 12:14 UTC