Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 30th Jan 2008 22:57 UTC, submitted by irbis
Opera Software "Tabs. Mouse gestures. User-agent switcher. Dedicated transfer window. Pop-up blocking and javascript abuse filtering. Integrated search box. Page zoom. Session saver. Chew on those features. We'll be coming back to them."
Thread beginning with comment 298758
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
twelve years ago
by yahya on Thu 31st Jan 2008 23:50 UTC
yahya
Member since:
2007-03-29

Yes, 1996 was the time I also discovered Opera, through a small newspaper article, hailing its speed and low resource consumption. I downloaded, I even registered, paid the equivalent of then 35 USD and used it for maybe three to four years as my default browser. It was just incredibly fast. And it fitted on a single 1.44'' diskette. That was just great, as it made "download once, install many" easy. Yes and it had just all you needed at that time. No kitchen sink, no mail, no news, no bittorrent. It was just a browser, pure and simple. A fast browser. With tabs (MDI, to be precise), long before mozilla reinvented them. With mouse gestures, also years before moz. Running like a breeze on a box with 4 MBytes of RAM and Windows 3.1.1

It was never particularly sexy, but it was incredibly functional and the only real option on the low-end boxes that I had access to. It demonstrated that a browser does not need to hammer the system!

However, later when I switched to Linux (around 1999/2000) I gradually moved away from Opera (which was available in alpha for Linux) to slowly maturing Mozilla.

For me, Opera lost most of its attractiveness, when they started sacrificing speed, small size and footprint to the demand for a kitchen sink solution. Integrated mail clients (heck, I cannot imagine anyone seriously uses it!), integrated mail, bittorrent, desktop widgets and lost of other gimmicks with very limited use.

In fact, the defining feature of Opera had been that it had been just a browser, at a time when everyone else forced their all-in-one solutions upon you. Some years later, everyone else was re-discovering the "just a browser" paradigm (pioneered by Galeon, who remembers?) while Opera was heading in the opposite direction.

To me the final momentum which removed opera from the list of options that I consider seriously, was that fact that less and less of those omnipresent web 2.0 sites play well with Opera. Sorry, but it seems the author is true in that sense: The time has passed, the moment has been missed (if it ever existed)

Edited 2008-01-31 23:53 UTC

Reply Score: 1

RE: twelve years ago
by Liquidator on Fri 1st Feb 2008 01:15 in reply to "twelve years ago"
Liquidator Member since:
2007-03-04

For me, Opera lost most of its attractiveness, when they started sacrificing speed, small size and footprint to the demand for a kitchen sink solution.

Errrh...Not really. See, Opera has a browser, an email client, an RSS reader, a Usenet reader, an IRC client, a BitTorrent client, everything in one application and weights 4.20MB. Now, Firefox only has a browser but weights...5.57MB. How does that sound to you?

Integrated mail clients (heck, I cannot imagine anyone seriously uses it!)

Me. And where I work also. I used to use MS Outlook and Thunderbird. Opera's M2 is just a lot better to handle large amounts of emails with its filters and its database concept rather than directories. Oh, and I have never have any data corruption problem with Opera M2 in 4 years. I really[i] suggest you give it a whirl, and try to use its features entirely. It's a little weird to use filters instead of directories in the beginning but afterward, you don't look back. It's kind of Gmail vs. Hotmail, really.

[i]integrated mail, bittorrent, desktop widgets and lost of other gimmicks with very limited use.


Integrated mail is neat, really. Not launching a second application when you click a mail link is much better. And a desktop mail client is faster than a webmail, obviously.

Some years later, everyone else was re-discovering the "just a browser" paradigm (pioneered by Galeon, who remembers?) while Opera was heading in the opposite direction.

Opera is different, and Opera users want it to stay different for sure ;)
I just don't want Opera to be and to behave like Mozilla or Microsoft browsers, I don't feel at ease each time I have to use one of those. I feel I'm missing something when I have to use a browser-only application. Personally, I prefer Seamonkey to Firefox because it's more feature-rich, but I dislike the fact that Seamonkey hasn't integrated its subapplications into just one, among other problems. Opera will stay a niche browser most probably because not many people like the way it is. If people liked Internet suites, Seamonkey would be in front of Firefox, but in fact, people hardly ever use Seamonkey, they prefer Firefox, same for Opera.

To me the final momentum which removed opera from the list of options that I consider seriously, was that fact that less and less of those omnipresent web 2.0 sites play well with Opera.

This is true, and not just Web 2.0 sites. Any web site may work well, not that well, or not at all. This is because people are too lazy to test their sites in Opera. Some people don't even test their sites in Firefox (these notorious IE-only sites).

Reply Parent Score: 1