Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 1st Feb 2008 20:39 UTC, submitted by WillM
Thread beginning with comment 298927
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: If they were really after FOSS...
by tomcat on Fri 1st Feb 2008 23:25
in reply to "If they were really after FOSS..."
How about a copy of SQL Server that could be hosted on Linux or FreeBSD?
Microsoft's definition of "open source" is far closer to mySQL's definition than the one you're proposing; that is, corporate customers can see the code, but that's about it.
How about licensing the .NET Framework under X11/MIT or BSD license?
Because the definition of "open source" is larger than just those licenses.
RE[2]: If they were really after FOSS...
by DrillSgt on Sat 2nd Feb 2008 00:57
in reply to "RE: If they were really after FOSS..."
"Microsoft's definition of "open source" is far closer to mySQL's definition than the one you're proposing; that is, corporate customers can see the code, but that's about it."
Everyone can see the code to MySQL.
http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/mysql/5.0.html#source
Where did you get the idea you couldn't? Microsoft will only show the code to paying corporate customers, where anyone can get the mySQL code. Big difference don't you think?







Member since:
2006-01-01
How about a copy of SQL Server that could be hosted on Linux or FreeBSD? How about licensing the .NET Framework under X11/MIT or BSD license?