Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 1st Feb 2008 20:49 UTC, submitted by anonymous
General Development "PHP 4, deployed on tens of millions of servers globally, is among the most successful languages of all time. But its run is coming to an end. Active development for the scripting language has been discontinued and security updates will conclude in August. And for some developers, PHP 4 will be history before Valentine's Day. On February 5, a group of influential Open Source projects will collectively stop all new development on their respectively platforms using PHP 4. However, there are still some holdouts opposing a complete transition to PHP 5 and it's not entirely clear whether or not PHP 4 will ever truly disappear."
Thread beginning with comment 298964
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Twits in charge
by jfb3 on Sat 2nd Feb 2008 02:06 UTC
jfb3
Member since:
2005-07-06

If the twits in charge would've just made it possible to have both PHP4 and PHP5 running in parallel this wouldn't be such a problem. Then we'd be able to migrate applications one at a time to the latest version.

RE: Twits in charge
by Sodki on Sat 2nd Feb 2008 03:00 in reply to "Twits in charge"
Sodki Member since:
2005-11-10

You _can_ have PHP4 and PHP5 running on the same server. I believe letting PHP4 die is a good thing. PHP5 has been around for years now and we can't waste the developers time with legacy stuff. But I don't believe PHP4 will die, because many are interested in it. Maintaining PHP4 and legacy PHP4 apps could lead up to some very interesting business opportunities for third party companies and developers.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[2]: Twits in charge
by jfb3 on Sun 3rd Feb 2008 02:15 in reply to "RE: Twits in charge"
jfb3 Member since:
2005-07-06

Uhmm, no. You can have one as mod and the other as cgi. But not both mod (the way almost everyone runs php) at the same time. Thus, conversion is not as easy as it should be. (Or maybe not even possible.) Might there be some function available in one version that doesn't exist in the other, and then there are the associated performance issues.

Just think what would happen if Oracle or MS said "You can only have one DB engine active at a time.", I can tell you what would happen, no upgrades.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1