Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 9th Feb 2008 19:10 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 300213
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Not be an ass but...
by NelsonN on Sat 9th Feb 2008 21:35
in reply to "RE: Not be an ass but..."
The PE on most of these online companies are ridiculous. Always has been the case. Yahoo! should get off it's high horse because I remember history well.
Anyone remember AltaVista? I do.
Analysts (who I've never put that much credibility on) were saying it was worth billions, then after the .com bust and the rise of Google it wasn't worth so much.
RE[3]: Not be an ass but...
by Buck on Sat 9th Feb 2008 21:43
in reply to "RE[2]: Not be an ass but..."
RE[3]: Not be an ass but...
by sbergman27 on Sat 9th Feb 2008 21:55
in reply to "RE[2]: Not be an ass but..."
Funny. I hadn't thought about Altavista in years, and then happened to think about them yesterday, and went to the site just to see if it was still there.
They were king once upon a time. I remember it explaining in their FAQ why showing the context of the search words in the results was not feasible. Google does. Sometimes the best technology *does* win out.
RE[3]: Not be an ass but...
by islander on Sun 10th Feb 2008 02:21
in reply to "RE[2]: Not be an ass but..."






Member since:
2005-11-15
Microsoft is paying a "fair" price based on historical PE of around 70. 70 itself is quite outrageous. Yahoo is demanding a minimum PE of 90 and that is way over the top.