Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 10th Feb 2008 14:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 300305
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
If Gnome and KDE were going to get a common object model shouldn't it be XPCOM from Mozilla? But XPCOM has been freely available for ten years now and neither Gnome nor KDE have picked it up. Instead we get object model bridges. Why would things be any different with IBM's SOM?
XPCOM and Xulrunner is a path to off-line web apps.