Thread beginning with comment 300531
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Do you believe it is OK for a software company to knowingly release an unfinished and defective product, take people's money, and fix the product in their own sweet time?
It's a god damn dot-Oh release for god's sake and it works for most people without problems. There are users with problems, yes. But compared to the overall userbase, it's the minority. That's what I meant when I wrote that some of the 10 million users may have problems that were not obvious in the beta test. Do you really think that Leopard could become the fastest adopted Mac OS X release if it was a buggy pile of crap with its initial release?
Do you believe it is OK for a software company to knowingly release an unfinished and defective product, take people's money, and fix the product in their own sweet time?
If so, do you accept this kind of behavior from any other industry?
If so, do you accept this kind of behavior from any other industry?
How about the auto industry (ever seen a recall)?
How about laptops with exploding batteries?
How about recalls on infant carseats?
How about toys with lead paint?
How about bridges that collapse?
Just about everything has issues of one sort or another. If you're demanding absolute perfection, you're never going to get it. I'm not saying it's right but you're assuming that there's something willfully malicious in what Apple did. My guess is that it ran fine on all of their test hardware and the only step left was to release it to everybody and wait for all of the bugs they didn't find to get reported.
If it was malicious, they'd probably charge you for the bug fixes.
Everybody should know what a dot-Oh release is. Even big companies with huge development budget can't beta test a piece of software that much that there won't be any problems for 10 million users.
IMO it's no big deal when a dot-Oh release has problems as long as they get fixed in a timely fashion.
It's not like Vista where it took Microsoft over a year to develop the first Service Pack and now they are even telling their users that, while SP1 is ready, they won't get it until March!
Leopard is a only 3.5 months and just received the second big update.
IMO it's no big deal when a dot-Oh release has problems as long as they get fixed in a timely fashion.
It's not like Vista where it took Microsoft over a year to develop the first Service Pack and now they are even telling their users that, while SP1 is ready, they won't get it until March!
Leopard is a only 3.5 months and just received the second big update.
What bugs me most though is that almost immediately after release, Apple made 10.5.1 available on retail discs. Makes me wonder about Leopard. Nothing against Apple, but this whole "Make fun of Windows for delays so we better not slip" is getting annoying.







Member since:
2005-07-06
Everybody should know what a dot-Oh release is. Even big companies with huge development budget can't beta test a piece of software that much that there won't be any problems for 10 million users.
IMO it's no big deal when a dot-Oh release has problems as long as they get fixed in a timely fashion.
It's not like Vista where it took Microsoft over a year to develop the first Service Pack and now they are even telling their users that, while SP1 is ready, they won't get it until March!
Leopard is a only 3.5 months and just received the second big update.