To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The first three words and the last sentence make it clear that I'm not telling anybody what they ought to use. For some reason if there is an article about a good looking lady, people defend the person without a need. I don't care what she uses. I just think that this is one of those software pieces people get dependent on without a real need. But if some-one is happy with it, by all means continue.
I have a strong personal opinion on that matter. I think learning a special language or program to make a non working prototype of something that still has to be developed is a waste of time. Same goes for UML. Instead of turning a problem into code, it becomes.. turning a problem into a abstract problem using objects or what might not so it can be turned into code. In my opinion a useless step. But I don't care about people taking that step.
My comment had nothing to do with her being a woman, or even a cute woman, but thanks for bringing it down to the lowest common denominator. You gave your opinion, I gave mine, and that is all that's to it. I am not defending her without need, I was defending her right to make choices, without being second guessed by people who have no idea why she made that choice.






Member since:
2005-08-11
Don't presume to tell her what she needs or doesn't need. It's her toolbox, and she should use what makes most sense to her. Let her make her own choices.