Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 12th Feb 2008 20:39 UTC, submitted by udif
Thread beginning with comment 300745
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: More OSS to the people!
by Redeeman on Wed 13th Feb 2008 11:39
in reply to "RE[2]: More OSS to the people!"
RE[3]: More OSS to the people!
by prymitive on Wed 13th Feb 2008 19:32
in reply to "RE[2]: More OSS to the people!"
RE[4]: More OSS to the people!
by Kebabbert on Thu 14th Feb 2008 09:07
in reply to "RE[3]: More OSS to the people!"
Why SUN would open source Windows, Office, OOXML, etc - if SUN bought Microsoft? Well... SUN has opened everything it has? Why would SUN behave differently if they acquire Microsoft? Do you mean SUN behaves irrationally, open sourcing somethings, but refuses to open source the rest?
It sure took time to open Java, several years, but SUN had to prove that they owned every line of code. That took time. They will surely open everything left also. And they will surely open everything they buy also. Otherwise that wouldnt fit into SUNs new strategy; open everything it has.





Member since:
2007-07-27
If SUN bought Microsoft, dont you believe they would open source Windows, Office, etc? SUN would open source everything else in their product portfolio Solaris, Java, SPARC CPU, ZFS, DTrace, etc etc etc, except Windows, Office, etc? Is that so, you mean?