Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 14th Feb 2008 17:44 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 301016
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: summary: Still noticeably slower than XP SP2
by stestagg on Fri 15th Feb 2008 00:41
in reply to "RE: summary: Still noticeably slower than XP SP2"
RE[3]: summary: Still noticeably slower than XP SP2
by modmans2ndcoming on Fri 15th Feb 2008 02:05
in reply to "RE[2]: summary: Still noticeably slower than XP SP2"
yes, same system same card most up-to-date drivers.
blanking is caused by windows XP relying on the application to draw its images, vista with aero enabled handles the redraws, thus no more blanking. Tearing is also dealt with because Vista is utilizing the 3d pipeline to deal with the windows (that is where the best performance is in a graphics card exists)







Member since:
2005-11-09
When I work on a dual core PC with 2 gigs of dual channel DDR2 memory and XP still gets page tearing, I do not call it fast. Vista has a smooth UI and that is what I care about most of all, yes, file copy in vista was broken, but it got fixed and SP1 seems to speed it up.