Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Feb 2008 20:29 UTC
Apple Ars has reviewed the new Mac Pro. "The performance of Harpertown and Stoakley is more evidence that Intel is doing right by Apple, and this eight-core monster is a worthy successor to the Mac Pro name. At USD 3599, it's expensive; the USD 800 cheaper 2.8GHz model will likely be adequate for the majority of users. But if you want maximum performance and a machine that's unlikely to show its age anytime soon, the Mac Pro is a good buy."
Thread beginning with comment 301843
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Redundancy
by renox on Thu 21st Feb 2008 13:08 UTC
renox
Member since:
2005-07-06

What's too bad about this kind of setup is that it has zero redundancy: for this price, two redundant power supply, disks in RAID and ECC memory would be nice..

RE: Redundancy
by dagw on Thu 21st Feb 2008 14:42 in reply to "Redundancy"
dagw Member since:
2005-07-06

What's too bad about this kind of setup is that it has zero redundancy: for this price, two redundant power supply, disks in RAID and ECC memory would be nice..


RAID (both hardware and software) is available as an option and the memory is ECC. Redundant power supplies aren't available, but I question how useful they are, from a value for money perspective, in workstations. Power supplies very rarely die, and as long as you are reasonably good at saving your work your data loss should be minimal on the off chance it does happen. Simply keep a spare power supply on site and you can have the dead workstation up and running in no time.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: Redundancy
by renox on Thu 21st Feb 2008 20:03 in reply to "RE: Redundancy"
renox Member since:
2005-07-06

Thanks for the correction.

That said, with this kind of hardware, the difference between a server and a workstation is 'thin': just the redundant of power supply, which is a must have for 24h uptime server and not so critical for workstation.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2