Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 21st Feb 2008 15:26 UTC, submitted by Robert Kratky
Opera Software Opera Software's CEO Jon S. von Tetzchner explains why they will not release the Opera browser as open source, arguing that open standards are more important than open source. Von Tetzchner also talks about the company's antitrust complaint to the European Commission in which it accuses Microsoft of abusing its dominant position by tying Internet Explorer to Windows.
Thread beginning with comment 302017
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: hrmmm
by da_Chicken on Fri 22nd Feb 2008 18:25 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: hrmmm"
da_Chicken
Member since:
2006-01-01

But this Tetzchner guy is clearly talking about open source vs. open standards as a choice that is worth considering.

Quote from the article:
"If you have a choice between open standards and open source, our choice would always be open standards."

He could have just said that Opera doesn't care for open source instead of setting up bogus choices. That would have been more honest, but it's not good PR.

I think his most sincere comment comes in the end of the same answer:
"and there would be the risk that people would look at our code and run away with it."

That seems to be the real reason why Opera isn't open source, and it has nothing to do with advocating open standards.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: hrmmm
by TLZ_ on Tue 26th Feb 2008 15:02 in reply to "RE[3]: hrmmm"
TLZ_ Member since:
2007-02-05

They aren't really claiming otherwise, are they?

Opera live on making programs, and running the bussiness would simply not be sustainable with open source.

(Remember that Opera isn't say... Apple who have a lot of renevue allready and don't have a problem with people using WebKit.)

They need to make money to stay alive as a bussiness, nobody(including Opera) is denying.

Reply Parent Score: 1