To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
If IE8 is as standard compliant as they say, then there should be little need to actually test it in the browser, any method that validates that your code is standards compliant would do.
Both FF3 and webkit are resonably standards compliant so if your code looks good in them, it should look good in IE8 too. E.g FF3 passes the acid2 test, and does quite well on acid3 (59/100) that is targeted at ecma script standard compliance. Have anybody teste IE8 with acid3? Would be fun to know how well it does on acid3 (http://acid3.acidtests.org/).
The real problem is people that still runs IE6. They are the ones that will prevent web developers from building standard compliant websites that looks good in every browser.
Not testing in all browsers is a good way to get your boss/client very angry with you. None of the big three interpret standards the same way, and none of them is 100% standard compliant. IE8 won't be either. Passing the Acid2 test and being relatively standards compliant is not a safe replacement for testing





Member since:
2005-11-10
What's worse, will it install over IE7?
Supporting IE is a joke. Every other browser vendor allows you to run multiple versions side by side and add/remove them as you please. Microsoft actually expect you to download an entire virtual machine, just to test in IE. It's insane, and I suspect IE8 will be just as difficult, causing take up to be slow, yet again.