Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th Feb 2008 21:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 302492
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by tyrione
by hobgoblin on Wed 27th Feb 2008 00:43
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by tyrione"
RE[4]: Comment by tyrione
by sbergman27 on Wed 27th Feb 2008 01:07
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by tyrione"
also, the linux kernel may never have happened if the hurd had been usable in 91 or so...
And if we could eat rocks, we could use them for food.
It's 2008. And we're still waiting.
The FSF has accomplished much, but has a penchant for laying claim to even more... while downplaying the significance of the projects which have accomplished what they failed to do, despite having a 7 year head start, in general, and a 1 year head start with HURD, in particular. Namely, getting a usable kernel out to crown their "GNU OS".[1]
Richard urges people to give his organization credit for its work, while failing to give others due credit for their amazing, and apparently supergnustical feats.
As Linus quipped the other day, "User space is **so** easy!".
[1] Work on GNU OS started 23 years ago, I believe. There was a failed attempt to adapt a kernel from a prexisting project. And work began on the HURD in 1990.
Edited 2008-02-27 01:15 UTC






Member since:
2005-08-07
No, I think he's pissed that his project comprises about 50% of most "Linux" systems, and yet the most associated project comprises about 2%
Edited 2008-02-26 23:43 UTC