Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th Feb 2008 15:08 UTC, submitted by masalinger
Thread beginning with comment 302524
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well, they haven't yet...
Well, now they have Mono, backed by Novell and GNOME...
The great thing about Mono is that you can run Java, Python, Ruby and many other languages on top of the Mono VM
This is if you have previously compiled the code. If you are compiling at runtime you have 5 compilers instead of five runtimes.
However, if Mono means we will get ready-to-jit .NET IL code instead of tons of text files I am all for it.






Member since:
2008-02-22
Well, they haven't yet...
DE writers should stick to at most two technologies, one being native code.
Why only 2? The more languages a DE has bindings for, the more people who are able to contribute. Don't know C, but know C#? Use the Mono bindings. Don't know C, but know Python? Use the Python bindings. End-users don't care what language programs are written in as long as they work and get the job done.
The great thing about Mono is that you can run Java, Python, Ruby and many other languages on top of the Mono VM - I think another poster already brought this up in an earlier post.