Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th Feb 2008 20:59 UTC, submitted by Oliver
Thread beginning with comment 302581
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2006-10-08
The article is really informative, I recommend reading it to anyone who is interested in the development of FreeBSD, bot also to users wo would ask: "Why should I try it?"
I'm interested in how can ZFS data be accessed in cases of emergency (rescue system, maintenance operations); with UFS storage partitions, I didn't have any problems using linve system CDs (based upon FreeBSD) or the rescue system on the / partition. The features of ZFS are really cool and would be an improvement over the traditional way of partitioning in FreeBSD.
NB: While everything works, it's okay. But only in the case of a failure you can see how valueable your tools are.
I fear I'm note brave enough to try it on my production systems... :-)
Whenever FreeBSD offers a new release, I'm happy that it is my main OS (next to Solaris), I use it on servers and desktops since the days of 4.0. Every release gives a speed improvement on the same (!) hardware, something that I'm really missing on non-BSD OSes. Stability, easyness of use, userfriendlyness, the tidy system architecture and of course the excellent documentation (manpages, handbook, comments in sources) are really appealing to me.
Many thanks, FreeBSD developers, you saved me from complete madness. :-)
As soon as 7.0-RELEASE is out, I'm sure I'll install permanent systems to replace older (but flawlessly working) 5.x and 6.x systems.