Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 26th Feb 2008 18:08 UTC
Comics
Thread beginning with comment 302675
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: I disagree.
by Morgan on Wed 27th Feb 2008 19:31 UTC in reply to "I disagree."
Morgan
Member since:
2005-06-29

Or, as I have done in the past, use Xfce as a direct replacement for GNOME on a fast system. My reason is thus: Modern GNOME on an old or slow system is nearly unbearable. Xfce on such a system is useable and therefore popular. On new, fast hardware, GNOME is decent and should remain the default DE. Xfce on that new hardware is absolutely blazingly fast and should be an option at install. This means increased productivity and less fatigue should the user choose to go with it, while maintaining support for GNOME and KDE apps.

I, too, think Xfce is just fine where it is, there's no need for GNOME to go away at all. I would prefer Xfce to stay third place and keep its lightweight but powerful soul, while benefitting from the wonderful apps that make up the GNOME environment.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3