To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
. But it is not a preview of FreeBSD 7.0, as 7.0 is already released. The title of the original article says Review, not Preview.
The article is a nice preview of the features in the upcoming releases after 7.0, however.
Edit: But it seems indeed that the original article is a bit late and should have been published earlier, already before 7.0 was released, and the text is a bit confusing therefore.
Edited 2008-03-06 18:12 UTC
Well, your description is far better than most sites that turn up if you google "freebsd 7 review" including the site you linked to. "The next major update of FreeBSD 7, due this December","I’m certainly looking forward to the pending 7.0 release and beyond."
In other news, "Hitler invades Poland" 3/7/2008.
>Linux kernel 2.6.25-rc4 was the Linux version tested
Maybe with the kernel release it will be even better, maybe it will be worse. Linux is always a developer snapshot since they abolished stable and developer kernels.
>The Linux kernel used is not a "stable release" whereas FreeBSD is (although I'm not aware of any significant performance improvements over the 2.6.24 kernel
--from the benchmark
But maybe there are heavy bugs in the .24 kernel?
Nobody has confirmed or verified this yet.
Kris' benchmarks were up to date until FreeBSD 7 was released
He cannot test for future releases! Oh one more thing If you u like to compare new stuff (like 2.6.25-rc4) then you must try FreeBSD 8
So, let's not rush like Slashdotters by submitting "an update" as if Linux is going to die because of this.
Of course, such challenges between open source devs is always welcome, it will delivier better products. But if Piggin is just trying to kill the news about FreeBSD then he's just wrong. Jeff and Kris has been in contact with Linux devs and discussed these issues for the past year to improve and point out weaknesses. So, when someone just appears in one day to prove that Linux is l33t and better is just .....
Edited 2008-03-07 05:45 UTC
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/npiggin/sysbench/
Hmmm. That shows that Linux is really 33% faster than FreeBSD 7.0. But the FreeBSD press release said that FreeBSD 7.0 is 15% faster than the fastest Linux. I'm confused! ;-)
Nobody has confirmed or verified this yet.
Kris' benchmarks were up to date until FreeBSD 7 was released He cannot test for future releases! Oh one more thing If you u like to compare new stuff (like 2.6.25-rc4) then you must try FreeBSD 8 So, let's not rush like Slashdotters by submitting "an update" as if Linux is going to die because of this.
Of course, such challenges between open source devs is always welcome, it will delivier better products. But if Piggin is just trying to kill the news about FreeBSD then he's just wrong. Jeff and Kris has been in contact with Linux devs and discussed these issues for the past year to improve and point out weaknesses. So, when someone just appears in one day to prove that Linux is l33t and better is just .....
some linux dude modded me down I am just reposting so others do not ask this question again.
Edited 2008-03-07 10:43 UTC





Member since:
2007-01-08
Well... the review was a bit short but ok.
Here's YAB (Yet Another Benchmark):
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/npiggin/sysbench/
Edited 2008-03-06 16:51 UTC