Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 6th Mar 2008 16:38 UTC, submitted by irbis
FreeBSD "The next major update of FreeBSD 7, due this December, is in the running to be one of the most impressive FreeBSD releases to date. The ULE scheduler has now reached maturity, leading to significant gains across the board (particularly in server workloads). This new scheduler brings notably impressive performance improvements to both MySQL and PostgreSQL. In the first section of this article, I'm going to take a look at what's new. In the second section, I will discuss what the future holds for FreeBSD beyond the upcoming FreeBSD 7.0 release, including screen shots of the revamped FreeBSD installer 'finstall'."
Thread beginning with comment 303664
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Benchmark
by Oliver on Thu 6th Mar 2008 20:03 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Benchmark"
Member since:

C'mon this is no stable release, you should really nobody with a sane mind would use such kernel in production! Yeah apart from some desktop users (hello Windows) :->

Have a look at Debian, guess why they are using no bleeding edge kernel? Because _you_ and every other user of bleeding edge kernels are the beta tester!

But don't be to tearful, there is a life after the flame ;)

As you can see here, the ultimative truth about Linux and BSD *g*

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[4]: Benchmark
by sakeniwefu on Fri 7th Mar 2008 00:06 in reply to "RE[3]: Benchmark"
sakeniwefu Member since:

We can see, but we cannot read the funny(?) German comments in between.

Linux is great when everything works, has better hw support, and Debian is a great Desktop system most of the time, hail aptitude!, but when you have a problem:

BSD - How do I configure xxxx? man xxxx
Linux - How do I configure xxxx? man xxxx, huh? google xxxx, huh? google Fedora Core kernel 2.6.22 xxxx, "Hey xxxx sploded on me wtf omg i needs hlp","RTFM","recompile your kernel with option --xxxx", huh?

Reply Parent Score: 0