Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 10th Mar 2008 17:27 UTC, submitted by Rodrigo Menezes
"One major feature present in Fedora 9 will be the ext4 implementation. The new filesystem will not be the default for the distribution, but will be available for users and systems administrators to enable. New functionality includes larger capacities and online defragmentation, for better performance and more reliability. To find out more, we talked with Eric Sandeen, Fedora project member and filesystem developer at Red Hat."
Thread beginning with comment 304142
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2006-01-31
Member since:2006-01-07
btrfs looks promising to me in security aspect:)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BTR-80
Member since:2005-07-06
"The btrfs will be the next killer fs for Linux. What reiser4 promised, will be delivered by btrfs.
I respectfully disagree. The btrfs feature set was carefully selected to include features that are actually useful in the real world, without all the pie-in-the-sky crap that Reiser4 promised, and without all the VFS pollution that it delivered. "
True, I think the focus should be on 'real world' features that are useful rather than great engineering feats but result in nothing beneficial when the rubber hits the road. With that being said, there still needs to be more work done on responsiveness. I have Fedora 8, for example, and when I try to run something heavy CPU utilisation I find that the responsiveness when browsing and downloading websites slows dramatically.
Small things like that need to be fixed. Yes, I know it isn't explicitly related to the ext4fs, but at the same time, this has to do with the over all need to refocus by Linux developers on what affects the end users on a regular basis.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2005-07-24
I respectfully disagree. The btrfs feature set was carefully selected to include features that are actually useful in the real world, without all the pie-in-the-sky crap that Reiser4 promised, and without all the VFS polution that it delivered.
It is a feature set that is ambitious enough to be exciting, but not so overly-ambitious as to be unattainable in a reasonable time frame.
And unlike Hans, Chris seems like a good team player, who is interested in working *with* the greater community. And that bodes well for his exciting new filesystem.
As the ext3 vs reiser4 faked benchmark fiasco, and his general demeanor so clearly demonstrated, Hans could not be trusted, nor could he be relied upon to act with the interests of the community at heart.
I'm and ext3/4 fan. But I look forward to a usable btrfs with great anticipation.
Edited 2008-03-10 20:09 UTC