Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 11th Mar 2008 09:58 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Internet & Networking Apparantly, Silverlight is doing well. It was announced [.wmv] at a MIX '08 keynote that Silverlight is being installed on internet users' machines at a rate of 1.5 million per day. Silverlight is being used in places like Netflix and to webcast over 3000 hours of the 2008 Olympic Games.
Thread beginning with comment 304303
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Microsoft update service
by Blackhouse on Tue 11th Mar 2008 10:31 UTC
Blackhouse
Member since:
2005-07-06

Doesn't Silverlight come with the standard updates retrieved from Windows/Microsoft update? If so 1,5 million downloads a day is barely an accomplishment as it gets pushed to the user.

Are there any good implementations of Silverlight yet and is there an advantage for the user compared to Flash so far?

RE: Microsoft update service
by google_ninja on Tue 11th Mar 2008 11:48 in reply to "Microsoft update service"
google_ninja Member since:
2006-02-05

it isn't getting pushed over windows update yet.

Right now, we are at 1.0, which is javascript only and with no user controls (if you want a textbox, you build it from scratch). What 1.0 has going for it over flash is that it will deliver hi-def video out of the box, and it does it well.

Most people I know are waiting for 2.0 (later this year, beta 1 just came out for it). 2.0 will have more of the framework, use any .net language, and have user controls. This will make silverlight very compelling for doing rich applications interfaces for the web, which is something flash is used for, but wasn't really designed to do.

IMO it will take 3.0 or 4.0 before we have a real flash killer, simply because while the tools for developers are already way beyond what flash offers, the tools for designers are nowhere near there yet. (Same goes for WPF)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE[2]: Microsoft update service
by Beta on Tue 11th Mar 2008 12:44 in reply to "RE: Microsoft update service"
Beta Member since:
2005-07-06

How does Flash not deliver hi-def video out of the box, it has h.264 already. And since Flash automatically updates, more Flash users have support for it than people with Silverlight?

Of course, the Internet already had hi-def video without the need of these shims…

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: Microsoft update service
by elektrik on Tue 11th Mar 2008 12:49 in reply to "RE: Microsoft update service"
elektrik Member since:
2006-04-18

"it isn't getting pushed over windows update yet. "

It most certainly *is* being pushed with Windows update...

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5

RE[2]: Microsoft update service
by agrouf on Tue 11th Mar 2008 13:09 in reply to "RE: Microsoft update service"
agrouf Member since:
2006-11-17

Using flash or silversight for streaming video is one of the most stupid things I can think of. And still there are many flash videos on the web.
What is driving this trend? Stupidity? Money (do Adobe or Microsoft pay them)? Or is it just the trend driving the trend (the last cool thing)?
I believe we would all be better of if flash didn't support video. Don't provide the stupid web designers with weapons, or they'll use it.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 4

RE[2]: Microsoft update service
by traherom on Tue 11th Mar 2008 13:21 in reply to "RE: Microsoft update service"
traherom Member since:
2007-03-01

It has been pushed to both my Vista machine and two XP ones.

However, I've failed to have it actually work under Firefox yet.

Edited 2008-03-11 13:22 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2