Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 10th Mar 2008 19:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 304674
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Always the doors
by Soulbender on Wed 12th Mar 2008 15:16
in reply to "RE[3]: Always the doors"
Member since:2005-08-18
RE[5]: Always the doors
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 12th Mar 2008 17:31
in reply to "RE[4]: Always the doors"
Member since:2005-06-29
Member since:2007-09-05
If it was a total failure it wouldn't have made you so defensive.
False.
It is a total failure, and I am pointing that out since a lot of people seem to think that the drawing is based on reality rather than a huge misunderstanding.
Pointing out failures doesn't mean that the failure stops being a failure.
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2007-09-05
So Thom Holwerda, what about the fact that Opera never sued Microsoft?
What Opera did was to ask the EU to investigate Microsoft. It was an antitrust complaint, not a lawsuit. Opera isn't going to make any money from this or anything like that.
And besides, it was this antitrust complaint which caused Microsoft to change its mind and default to standards mode in IE8.
So I don't get the drawing. It's pointless. And it's very old news by now anyway.
And finally, Opera is doing well financially. It's profitable, has a large pile of cash, and desktop revenue alone grew from between 50 to more than 100% last year. So again, I don't get it. Your drawing is basically failing on all levels...