Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 10th Mar 2008 19:55 UTC
Comics
Thread beginning with comment 304717
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Always the doors
by Soulbender on Wed 12th Mar 2008 15:16 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Always the doors"
Soulbender
Member since:
2005-08-18

Your drawing is basically failing on all levels...


If it was a total failure it wouldn't have made you so defensive.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[5]: Always the doors
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 12th Mar 2008 17:31 in reply to "RE[4]: Always the doors"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

Soulbender, the funny thing is, even, that the comic doesn't even *mention* Microsoft. Someone in the comments did.

People are predictable.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[6]: Always the doors
by hangman on Wed 12th Mar 2008 20:03 in reply to "RE[5]: Always the doors"
hangman Member since:
2007-09-05

Soulbender, the funny thing is, even, that the comic doesn't even *mention* Microsoft. Someone in the comments did.

Who else would it be? Microsoft is the only company that's even close to having been sued, except it was not a lawsuit at all.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[5]: Always the doors
by hangman on Wed 12th Mar 2008 20:02 in reply to "RE[4]: Always the doors"
hangman Member since:
2007-09-05

If it was a total failure it wouldn't have made you so defensive.

False.

It is a total failure, and I am pointing that out since a lot of people seem to think that the drawing is based on reality rather than a huge misunderstanding.

Pointing out failures doesn't mean that the failure stops being a failure.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1