Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 12th Mar 2008 22:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 304907
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.





Member since:
2007-08-22
I don't sit on the KDE lists much at all, so this is just my personal observations -
KDE seems to keep larger changes to the bigger release (KDE3, KDE4), which happen every few years. They let that guide the minor releases, which will tend to have some big, not architecturally big, changes (e.g. KDE 3.3 vs. KDE 3.4). This then leaves minor enhancements, and bug fixes, etc. for the point releases (e.g. KDE 3.4.9, KDE 4.0.2). So I think they have been consistent.
Last I read about major changes to KDE was for the 3.4 release, which was quite nice over 3.3 - though I didn't use 3.3 much. (I transitioned to KDE around that time from GNOME.)
Any how...from my perspective KDE has a consistent and good plan - use the major version for major arch issues, minor version for functional updates and major fixes within the arch, and point releases for bug fixes, etc. They also do quite well with getting updates out too.
Haven't paid much attention to GNOME lately, but they don't seem to be making any where near the news or doing near as much to put together a user friendly desktop as the KDE folks (one of the reasons I moved to KDE).