Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 19th Mar 2008 10:37 UTC, submitted by Oliver
Geek stuff, sci-fi... Arthur C. Clarke, who peered into the heavens with a homemade telescope as a boy and grew up to become a visionary titan of science-fiction writing and collaborated with director Stanley Kubrick on the landmark film "2001: A Space Odyssey", has died. He was 90. The knighted British-born writer died early Wednesday in Colombo, Sri Lanka, where he had made his home for decades, after experiencing a cardio-respiratory attack, his secretary, Rohan De Silva, told Reuters. May he rest in peace, and I'd like to extend my sincere condolences to his family and friends. The pod-bay doors will open for the last time.
Thread beginning with comment 305719
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Oliver
by primelight@live.com on Wed 19th Mar 2008 19:31 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Oliver"
primelight@live.com
Member since:
2008-03-19

""One judges an artist not by his lifestyle, character, or actions, but by his art."

One of the the most important lessons I've received (from my Dutch Literature teacher)."


Thom,

So you are OK with possible child abuse as long as good art is produced?

I'm not impressed.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: -3

RE[4]: Comment by Oliver
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 19th Mar 2008 20:56 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Oliver"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

So you are OK with possible child abuse as long as good art is produced?


Don't twist my words - I'm not approving of child abuse. All I'm saying is that someone's personal lifestyle, or wrongdoings, have no influence in my appreciation for that person's art.

If Hitler was actually a good painter (instead of the crappy one he was) and produced good art, I'd still say it was good art, despite his horrendous crimes.

UPDATE: Oops, I wrote it the wrong way in that comment. What I meant was: "One judges art not by the artist that made it, but by the art itself."

Hope that clears it up.

Edited 2008-03-19 20:58 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1

RE[5]: Comment by Oliver
by h3rman on Wed 19th Mar 2008 21:33 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Oliver"
h3rman Member since:
2006-08-09

If Hitler was actually a good painter (instead of the crappy one he was) and produced good art, I'd still say it was good art, despite his horrendous crimes.


Except that that's purely hypothetical.

A good tree cannot bear bad fruit,
nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.

:)

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2