Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 19th Mar 2008 22:58 UTC, submitted by diegocg
Thread beginning with comment 305811
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Debian already has this?
by sbergman27 on Thu 20th Mar 2008 12:08
in reply to "RE[2]: Debian already has this?"
If it's as simple as adding selinux=0 to your kernel boot string, where's the "very difficult" bit?
The "difficult" bit (perhaps "tricky" might have been a better term) is knowing that you can't just disable it and have it really be out of the way. "Disabling" SELinux during the install, or afterward, merely causes it not to load a policy. I imagine that most people who think they have it disabled really don't, not realizing that you have to manually edit grub.conf to add the right string after every kernel upgrade to avoid the "SELinux tax" on performance.
Edited 2008-03-20 12:16 UTC
RE[4]: Debian already has this?
by Flatland_Spider on Thu 20th Mar 2008 13:37
in reply to "RE[3]: Debian already has this?"






Member since:
2006-08-09
I sense a little dichotomy here. If it's as simple as adding selinux=0 to your kernel boot string, where's the "very difficult" bit?
Not a rhetorical question, I frankly have no idea of kernel level SELinux mechanisms.