To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I was going to say this as well. On its own, this doesn't really validate the GPL in any way, all it really says is VZW decided that the cost of pursuing it in court would be greater than the cost of settling instead. This is relatively common, regardless of whether or not the legal claims in fact have any teeth.
That's why I said "legal momentum" instead of "precedent." Perhaps victory is too strong a word, which should be reserved for an actual judgement by the court. But the GPL certainly prevailed in this case. And Verizon settling is going to make other GPL violators more likely to settle too.
I really do not know how you can come to this conclusion. The GPL didn't 'win'. Another 'determined' entity in the future may in fact decide to go through the full legal process, at which point the GPL will be tested (again).
Some entities simply couldn't be bothered and want to put things like this behind them. That doesn't mean they were wrong, not even close.
Edited 2008-03-20 20:28 UTC
Well, if you call establishing a 100% fulfillment of one's demands as "not winning", then the GPL - side did "not win".
As far as I can see, they got correctly compensated, because the modified code now is free, and they got an undisclosed amount of money.
I think in this case an out of court settlement is not a sign of weakness, but a sign of strength. The Verizon lawyers obviously told the Verizon execs, that winning this lawsuit was next to impossible, and the execs did the only rational thing - they fulfilled the demands.







Member since:
2005-11-10
This is not a legal victory.
A legal victory would be winning an injunction against Verzion, or in some way being correctly compensated for Verzion's /actions/.
An out of court settlement is a deferment - not a victory.
This has no precedent on GPL violations anywhere else.
*fessa-russah-fessin*