Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 20th Mar 2008 17:52 UTC, submitted by WillM
Thread beginning with comment 305863
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Indeed... people try to make it sound like the MS lawsuit was about MS wanting to extend java. In reality the lawsuit wasn't so much about that as it was MS's desire to extend it in ways that caused Sun compatible Java apps to fail when run on MS VMs.
MS refused to fix the issues, and thus the lawsuit.





Member since:
2005-07-06
That is incorrect. MS's implementation of Java wasn't able to pass Sun's compliancy test due to it having Windows only hooks...it had nothing to do with the way the software it created 'looked' or whatnot.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%2B%2B#Litigation_against_J.2...