Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 20th Mar 2008 17:52 UTC, submitted by WillM
Thread beginning with comment 305982
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2006-02-05
WPF isn't a failure, it is just that the tooling isn't at the point yet where you can approach it like a VB6 programmer (ie: without thought). Its actually my favorite UI platform to work with, and I have tried many of them. But you actually have to learn it before you can use it, as opposed to winforms which is basically drag and drop.
Out of all the 3.5 technologies, WPF is getting the least adoption because of that, which is ironic as it is one of the most impressive (IMO WF was the biggest failure. The idea is "BizTalk lite", but the performance is so abysmal it is only useful in very specific scenarios.)
The funny thing is that one of the silverlight advantages being pushed at us .net guys from redmond is you can "leverage your existing WPF skills". Instead, the way it is turning out is that Silverlight is the driving force in WPF adoption.