Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 21st Mar 2008 22:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 306053
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links




Member since:
2005-11-12
I downloaded the nightly build and it looks like some decent work went into Firefox 3. The memory usage appears to be much better. It is running about 50% below Firefox 2. It looks like a Kool release. It is pretty amazing how eight years later XUL appears to work well using native widgets now. I guess good things can take awhile.
I can see how XULRunner is ready for desktop widgets and such. I saw in Fedora 9 builds recently the inclusion of XULRunner. I look forward to seeing how Redhat will integrate this. I have always liked the speed at which a GUI application can be strung together with XUL and some javascript. Now that the performance is decent it seems like XUL desktop applications are ready for serious development.
Edited 2008-03-22 01:05 UTC