Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 21st Mar 2008 20:07 UTC, submitted by irbis
Features, Office "OpenOffice.org 3.0 is 167 days away, but who's counting? Maybe the software developers are counting because they have a whopping 2,278 issues targeted for this release. Even though OpenOffice.org 2.4 is not yet out the door, let's see how far they've come with OpenOffice.org 3.0."
Thread beginning with comment 306058
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Still no tabs?
by Liquidator on Sat 22nd Mar 2008 01:19 UTC in reply to "RE: Still no tabs?"
Liquidator
Member since:
2007-03-04

Yeah, I know this extension, it was developed during the summer of code if my memory doesn't fail me. The problem is that it's...An extension. I don't imagine Firefox with a "Tabs" extension. That would be terrible. These essential features have to come standard. And the tabs at the bottom are...Weird.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: Still no tabs?
by ahz1 on Sat 22nd Mar 2008 01:36 in reply to "RE[2]: Still no tabs?"
ahz1 Member since:
2007-04-05

First, the developers are still soliciting comments on the best way to implement tabs. Second, the response from the community shows little demand.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[3]: Still no tabs?
by buff on Sat 22nd Mar 2008 01:56 in reply to "RE[2]: Still no tabs?"
buff Member since:
2005-11-12

I don't imagine Firefox with a "Tabs" extension.

Guess what, the tab feature for Firefox is based on the Multizilla extension for the old Netscape 6 Suite now known as Seamonkey. Originally the browser had no tabs. It was added by the Multizilla extension and so many users/developers liked it they added the functionality. It is funny how old Netscape 6 stills lives on in code in Firefox. Read some of the XUL files and you will find original Netscape engineer comments. Ah, such an interesting history. Who remembers Phoenix? The predecessor to the Firefox browser. Here is a funny comment I found in the XUL Firefox 2 code: "XUL sucks!" It is good to see they have a sense of humor about their legacy technology.

Edited 2008-03-22 02:02 UTC

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 5