Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on Sat 22nd Mar 2008 08:40 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 306333
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Linux Mobile needs a dominant platform
by deviceguy on Mon 24th Mar 2008 00:31
in reply to "RE[4]: Linux Mobile needs a dominant platform"
Why would qtopia be a good idea? I had a zaurus sl5500 before my N800, and it was a lot more limited. I tried the qtopia 2 image provided by Trolltech, and it was okay, but it had a different abi and zero apps ran on it. Opie etc are *not* qtopia and their apps use a different abi to the qtopiia 1.x line. Qtopia is fragmented and stagnated!!! Legacy apps (qtopia 1.x) require a gcc 2.9x compiler. Bad idea. Then of course Opie uses 3.x iirc, so a lot better off - but out of Trolltech's remit. Not sure what the Trolltech qtopia 2.x uses, but without apps, does it really matter?
Qtopia has reached version 4. Qtopia 1 is 7 years old, and Qtopia 2 is about 5 years old. When the Nokia 770 was released there were no apps for it either, but that didn't stop anything. All Qtopia needs is a big player to put some muscle behind it.
As far as ABI is concerned, a recompile with the correct toolchain would fix that. and BYW, Qtopia 4 compiles with gcc4.






Member since:
2006-01-01
Why would qtopia be a good idea? I had a zaurus sl5500 before my N800, and it was a lot more limited. I tried the qtopia 2 image provided by Trolltech, and it was okay, but it had a different abi and zero apps ran on it. Opie etc are *not* qtopia and their apps use a different abi to the qtopiia 1.x line. Qtopia is fragmented and stagnated!!! Legacy apps (qtopia 1.x) require a gcc 2.9x compiler. Bad idea. Then of course Opie uses 3.x iirc, so a lot better off - but out of Trolltech's remit. Not sure what the Trolltech qtopia 2.x uses, but without apps, does it really matter?