Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 25th Mar 2008 16:33 UTC, submitted by irbis
Thread beginning with comment 306608
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Rather Intel than Sun...?
by ahmetaa on Tue 25th Mar 2008 19:45
in reply to "Rather Intel than Sun...?"
RE[2]: Rather Intel than Sun...?
by Detlef Niehof on Tue 25th Mar 2008 20:09
in reply to "RE: Rather Intel than Sun...?"
At least they have innovative ideas like Rock and Niagara instead of beating the old x86 donkey for years.
Would there be any technical advantage in dumping the x86 legacy instead of on-going compatibility? If so, could you provide some more explanation and/or a link to an informative web page?
Thanks heaps,
Detlef







Member since:
2006-10-27
I would expect such risky and expensive research campaigns rather from Intel than from Sun. Ok, Sun have also built its own chips for the server market but was not really successful as you can see on the upcoming Xeon series from Intel.