Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 27th Mar 2008 22:29 UTC, submitted by koki
Thread beginning with comment 306954
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Good article... couple minor issues
by mikesum32 on Fri 28th Mar 2008 00:32
in reply to "Good article... couple minor issues"
RE[2]: Good article... couple minor issues
by Michael Oliveira on Fri 28th Mar 2008 12:44
in reply to "RE: Good article... couple minor issues"
RE: Good article... couple minor issues
by bryanv on Fri 28th Mar 2008 14:14
in reply to "Good article... couple minor issues"
RE[2]: Good article... couple minor issues
by Steve Jabs on Fri 28th Mar 2008 14:54
in reply to "RE: Good article... couple minor issues"






Member since:
2006-05-26
I don't know whether this was originally written in English (seems likely) and then translated to Japanese, but if the Japanese is as good as the English version, they did very well, and it covers a lot of good details. However, there are a couple minor points it got wrong:
1. The name was switched from OpenBeOS to Haiku not for the purpose of copyright, but rather the issue of trademark issues: you can name any application anything you want, or book, or something similar under copyright laws, but the name "BeOS" itself was trademarked, and you can't reuse the same thing (or something too close) in the same field, which OpenBeOS was clearly in violation of that, assuming anyone cared.
2. Wait a minute, when did Bryan Varner move to Ohio from Indianapolis??? He currently lives in the same neighborhood I used to live in, about 1/4 mile away from where I lived (I now live in Microsoft's front/backyard).
Other than that, a very good article that showcases a lot of the issues that have happened and do happen in the real life drama of OSS development, especially for something as complex as re-creating something binary-compatible (mostly) to a sufficiently complex existing OS that has software that runs on it.