Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 28th Mar 2008 20:39 UTC, submitted by irbis
Thread beginning with comment 307111
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I think you made the case against, there. I for one think of "hacking" as actively breaking into a target system, without needing some unwitting assistance from the owner. Trojans and browser exploits cannot really be targeted towards a specific victim, unless you go to the trouble of performing some trick of social engineering, to get that person to run the trojan.exe or visit your poisoned website.
hacking = targeted, unaided
trojan-ing = indiscriminate, requires unwitting assistance of victim
Discussion welcome 






Member since:
2005-07-06
Of course it is still classed at hacking. How do you think a Trojan horse operates ? Exactly like the Trojan horse of legend. It would just sit there doing nothing until the people of Troy interacted with it, in their case, pulled it inside their town.
A computer Trojan horse is useless unless the user allows that into the system.