Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 28th Mar 2008 20:39 UTC, submitted by irbis
Thread beginning with comment 307187
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Uh... you are aware that if an Linux distro were so ill advised as to do this it would break many things? The idea is only root should be able to open privileged ports.
Well, I was assuming some firewall beyond iptables (something like firestarter) was present. I don't know how much safer it makes the system, but I tend to use them. It doesn't come by default in Ubuntu, though.
" Privilege escalation is an issue in Linux as well (as discussed in the "fakesudo" thread in Ubuntu forums),
This has nothing to do with privilege escalation. this is malware.
"
Right, maybe my usage of "privilege escalation" was incorrect, but "malware" is too general. What I meant is dialog spoofing and similar strategies, where you first control the user account and then get the root password from the user input. That's what the fakesudo thread was about.
It in theory will stop some privilege escalation attacks, but not all. In general setting up your system like that would be too inconvenient for most normal users (especially of OS X).
I've been using this setup for a few months in Linux.I expected OSX to have something more convenient and about as safe. I haven't heard of a better way to avoid dialog spoofing attacks, but I'm open to suggestions.






Member since:
2005-07-06
1) telnet itself is obsolete because of security reasons, and sshd should be off by default in desktop systems (and regular user should not be able to turn it on).
The telnet service is obsolete sure. Telnet as a client is an easy way to connect to an arbitrary service on an arbitrary port. Taking as a random example it is a good way to connect to an exploit that is listening on a port...
2)Only root should be able to open a port.
Uh... you are aware that if an Linux distro were so ill advised as to do this it would break many things? The idea is only root should be able to open privileged ports.
That is the definition of privilege escalation yes...
This has nothing to do with privilege escalation. this is malware.
So, even if it was a vulnerability in Safari, it was the OS fault if this led to a remote root login without the user entering its password. Not to mention that Safari is an Apple program, installed by default in OS-X, so there are no palliatives.
It in theory will stop some privilege escalation attacks, but not all. In general setting up your system like that would be too inconvenient for most normal users (especially of OS X).