Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 1st Apr 2008 15:56 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 307855
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.




Member since:
2005-07-27
On the contrary, I'm posting this from within Haiku on real hardware! I also have R5 on this same system, and I can honestly tell you that Haiku is much nicer to work with. My network card "just works" without configuration (not only do I have to configure it in BeOS, but network connectivity is so flaky as to be unusable). In Haiku, the native resolution on my monitor is supported, whereas in BeOS I have to endure stretch mode.
Sure, I don't have many of the applications I have in Linux or Windows, but how is that different than BeOS?
Stability is quite good IMO. Rarely does the kernel itself crash. Speed is another matter, as the system hasn't been optimized.
So I guess what I'm saying is: Should we give the impression to new users that they can replace their installation of Windows, Linux, or Mac with Haiku and be okay? Of course not. But the OS *is* useable day-to-day, and it is quite stable given that it's pre-alpha quality. There's still plenty of work to be done, to be sure, but I believe Haiku's quality has already surpassed that of R5. (YMMV, of course, and I acknowledge that.)
WHOO-HOO! Someone else who sees things as I see them! That's the spirit! See Haiku for what it can do and help others to see that same perspective, with hope and admiration! Haiku is where it is, today, because BeOS was good enough to be loved and admired by those who sought to help it continue life in the future... bigger and better than ever before! AUSA!
To one and all developers... KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!!!