Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 3rd Apr 2008 22:33 UTC
OpenStep, GNUstep The releases just keep on coming, don't they? The GNUstep live CD has been updated "The GNUstep live CD contains a lot of software for GNUstep, a free implementation of the OPENSTEP framework (which was also the base as Cocoa in Mac OS X)." The GNUstep page can tell you more about GNUstep itself.
Thread beginning with comment 308332
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Very nice...
by bousozoku on Sat 5th Apr 2008 17:02 UTC in reply to "Very nice..."
bousozoku
Member since:
2006-01-23

It's always cool to see something a little unusual... And to those who say that the NeXT look is ugly... What are you smoking? I've always found the gray NeXT to be the most elegant-looking of any Unix GUI ever (and that includes more recent versions of NeXT, aka OS X)


Sorry but I thought that NeXTStep looked bad in 1988. It may be elegant, but if it doesn't have appeal, other than its elegance, it's going to end up in a museum, not on someone's desktop. Moreso, for an optional desktop environment.

I always thought that BeOS was far more pleasant to use and achieved a lot of the same design goals. Mac OS X Leopard has finally gotten to a point where it's comfortable, and without 6 different styles. GNOME 2.20 isn't bad but I miss the original design, as it looked less like Win95 et al. and the same with KDE.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 3

RE[2]: Very nice...
by heron on Sat 5th Apr 2008 20:34 in reply to "RE: Very nice..."
heron Member since:
2005-08-07

As previously discussed, this type of thing is highly subjective.

This is why GNUstep has an existing theme engine which lets you change the look. Also, we're working on a more integrated theme engine.

Greg C.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 2

RE[2]: Very nice...
by greygandalf on Mon 7th Apr 2008 10:06 in reply to "RE: Very nice..."
greygandalf Member since:
2008-04-07


Sorry but I thought that NeXTStep looked bad in 1988. It may be elegant, but if it doesn't have appeal, other than its elegance, it's going to end up in a museum, not on someone's desktop. Moreso, for an optional desktop environment.


Sorry, but that is really your personal opinion. I thought NeXT looked great back then.. .and it still looks fine. I love an UI which doesn't come into your way. Also it is a nice combination of Look and Ergonomics, since many details of the GUI are not designed with the same user access guidelines as windows.

After all, compare win95 to win31. Look at the style of the widgets, the colors (not the ugly icons). They maintained most of the old windows feel, but the Look is clearly NeXT inspired! For me, the first thing to do on XP or Vista is to turn of the plastic/rubber look.

Reply Parent Bookmark Score: 1