To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Why the hell would you want standardized pixel sizes? I want them to continuously increase pixel sizes for as long as they can, at least until they hit around 600 DPI - not stick to some lame low-res standard locking display technology in the past without being able to fix all the crap our low ~100 DPI monitors force us to deal with, like having to choose between incorrectly placed glyphs or overly fuzzy glyphs.
known dimentions, pure and simple...
when one have standardized sizes for both displays and pixel density, one do not have silliness like webpages thats designed for 17" at some rez or other (because thats what the designer used)...
hell, lately i have been running into pages designed to be viewed on widescreen displays. most likely designed by some imac user...







Member since:
2005-07-06
interestingly, that just summed up my complaint about HDTV
still, how sits very close to a 30" monitor (like those dell have for sale)?
if you sit at desktop distance your moving your head to pick up the corners, and you could just as well have gone with a couple of smaller ones side by side.
but then i have this crazy ass dream about displays standardized around iso standard sizes (you know, the A4 and friends) with a standardized pizel size.