Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 7th Apr 2008 22:21 UTC
"One of the most significant moments in the history of the modern software industry took place in 1998 when Netscape announced plans to release the source code of its browser under a license that would freely permit modification and redistribution. That pivotal event represents the point at which software freedom extended its reach beyond the enthusiast community and began its ascent into the mainstream. To celebrate the success of the past ten years and reflect on some of the challenges that the open-source software community will face in the future, we spoke to some of the pioneers who were there on day zero when revolution started. We want to share their perspectives on a wide range of issues, including software patents, the emerging challenges and opportunities created by cloud computing, open-source software on the desktop, the importance of interoperability, and the ongoing fight to bring software freedom to the masses."
Thread beginning with comment 308558
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: And the 40 years before that?
by flanque on Tue 8th Apr 2008 03:00
in reply to "And the 40 years before that?"
Member since:2005-12-15
RE: And the 40 years before that?
by elsewhere on Tue 8th Apr 2008 04:36
in reply to "And the 40 years before that?"
Member since:2005-07-13
Anyone who thinks that coining a name for what developers had been doing since the 50s was some sort of 'revolution' missed the first 40 years of computing.
I get your point, and don't necessarily disagree with it, but I think the 'revolution' was that commercial companies started to see the value in what developers had been doing since the 50s.
That's a pretty significant milestone, because I think the quality and capability of OSS today is due in large part to commercial organizations pouring in code, R&D, and paid development. That they ultimately attempt (or hope) to profit from it is irrelevant, because the community in general still gains the benefit.
RE[2]: And the 40 years before that?
by bogomipz on Tue 8th Apr 2008 07:51
in reply to "RE: And the 40 years before that?"
Member since:2005-07-11
RE: And the 40 years before that?
by irbis on Tue 8th Apr 2008 10:11
in reply to "And the 40 years before that?"
Member since:2005-07-08
Open sourcing Netscape was important, of course. But I'm not sure if it was that revolutionary? It could be described more like going back to the original open source philosophy in software development.
Open source was mainstream, and also used by commercial companies already long before open-sourcing Netscape.
Also, wasn't it so that RMS started his free software movement when some commercial software (printer software etc.), that was previously open source, became proprietary and could not be modified and tweaked anymore?
From Wikipedia:
In the 50s, 60s, and 70s, it was normal for computer users to have the freedoms provided by free software. Software was produced largely by academics and corporate researchers working in collaboration and was not itself seen as a commodity. Software was commonly shared by individuals who used computers and by hardware manufacturers who were glad that people were making software that made their hardware useful. In the 70s and early 80s, the software industry began to apply copyright law, and began using technical measures such as only distributing binary copies, to prevent computer users from being able to study and modify the software.
In 1983, Richard Stallman launched the GNU project after becoming frustrated with the effects of the change in culture of the computer industry and users.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software#History In 1983, Richard Stallman launched the GNU project after becoming frustrated with the effects of the change in culture of the computer industry and users.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_free_software
Recent Original Stories
Recent Comments
Headlines
Random Comments
Random Stories
Random OS Link
Member since:
2006-02-15
Anyone who thinks that coining a name for what developers had been doing since the 50s was some sort of 'revolution' missed the first 40 years of computing.