Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 7th Apr 2008 22:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 308565
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: And the 40 years before that?
by bogomipz on Tue 8th Apr 2008 07:51
in reply to "RE: And the 40 years before that?"
RE[3]: And the 40 years before that?
by Cloudy on Wed 9th Apr 2008 01:40
in reply to "RE[2]: And the 40 years before that?"
It became 'mainstream' in 1957 when the first Fortran compiler was developed.
This whole silliness about a 'revolution' is confusing the widespread dissemination of computing as a whole with the widespread dissemination of freely available source code.
What happened in the 90s wasn't an "open source" revolution. It was simply that computers became cheap enough to become commodity consumer electronics.






Member since:
2005-07-13
I get your point, and don't necessarily disagree with it, but I think the 'revolution' was that commercial companies started to see the value in what developers had been doing since the 50s.
That's a pretty significant milestone, because I think the quality and capability of OSS today is due in large part to commercial organizations pouring in code, R&D, and paid development. That they ultimately attempt (or hope) to profit from it is irrelevant, because the community in general still gains the benefit.