Linked by Eugenia Loli on Tue 8th Apr 2008 07:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 308601
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well, in Linux you don't have Photoshop (please don't say GIMP - I tried to like it, but I'm sorry - until they redesign the UI, I can't work with it) or Flash. I guess you could do PHP development.
In MacOS X, you could do everything, but then again, I find it hard to spend a lot of money to get a new system that I have no idea if I can get along with.
There's still Pixel for Linux and many says it's superior to GIMP and mostly compare it to Photoshop. http://www.kanzelsberger.com ... sorry I couldn't resist 
(please don't say GIMP - I tried to like it, but I'm sorry - until they redesign the UI, I can't work with it)
C'mon. You can't say an alternative is worse if you aren't willing to put in the effort to learn it. I learned the GIMP before I learned Photoshop and I thought Photoshop did everything wrong, and was going "against the grain" but now I can use both because I've put in the effort to learn how to use both.





Member since:
2007-12-16
Linux - bad because there is no way I can do my job on it due to lack of good applications (I'm a webdeveloper)
I find this very odd since no expensive nor operating system dependent software is needed for webdeveloping. Not at least if the webdev has any knowledge of the web itself, not just the apps he's using to get the job done. Besides there're plenty great software for every OS, even the same apps, not just alternatives.