Linked by David Adams on Tue 8th Apr 2008 16:33 UTC
BSD and Darwin derivatives "I am very happy about the direction in which the Mac OS X GUI is going, although sadly many Mac users aren't interested in (or don't know about) the "lower levels" of the Macintosh Operating System. Have you ever wondered why the Terminal greets you with the words "Welcome to Darwin"? Why do BSD and Mac OS share certain bits of code? Why does Wikipedia describe Mac OS X as a graphical operating system? Today we're going to take a look at the underlying open source technology which powers your fancy Leopard OS - the hidden core set of components, named Darwin."
Thread beginning with comment 308720
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: What BSD could have been
by ari-free on Tue 8th Apr 2008 19:56 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: What BSD could have been"
Member since:

but linux didn't fork like the bsd's.

Reply Parent Score: 1

Johann Chua Member since:

Then why are there so many Debian-based distros? If that's not forking, then what is?

Reply Parent Score: 3

atriq Member since:

A distro fork is like FreeBSD and PC-BSD.

A kernel fork is like FreeBSD and DragonFlyBSD.

Debian can fork all it likes without the linux kernel ever forking.

Reply Parent Score: 3