Linked by David Adams on Tue 8th Apr 2008 16:33 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 308733
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Darwin's position within the BSD family tree
by puenktchen on Wed 9th Apr 2008 09:20
in reply to "Darwin's position within the BSD family tree"
that timeline completely ignores mach, nextstep and openstep. you might get the wrong impression that osx is only a fork of freebsd. this big unix timeline is much better:
http://www.levenez.com/unix/
RE[2]: Darwin's position within the BSD family tree
by memson on Wed 9th Apr 2008 10:15
in reply to "RE: Darwin's position within the BSD family tree"
I would go further than that... Darwin is based on the core of NEXTSTEP and OPENSTEP. The FreeBSD parts only happened when Apple replaced/updated *STEP components with them, or extended the core in to areas that the *STEP's didn't cover. The "comes from FreeBSD" is factually incorrect. "Converged with FreeBSD from disparete trunks of the same overall base" would be more correct.
RE[2]: Darwin's position within the BSD family tree
by Doc Pain on Wed 9th Apr 2008 18:08
in reply to "RE: Darwin's position within the BSD family tree"
that timeline completely ignores mach, nextstep and openstep. you might get the wrong impression that osx is only a fork of freebsd.
This impression should not be concluded from the timeline. Darwin and Mac OS X are no forks of BSD, but they have a strong relationship to BSD. Maybe this is not clearly shown by this timeline.
Yes, this one is much better and saves you from buying expensive wallpaper for your coding booth. :-)




Member since:
2006-10-08
To see Darwin's position within the BSD family tree and UNIX timeline, just have a look here:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/share/misc/bsd-family-tre...