Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th Apr 2008 20:14 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 308750
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
That fine print hasn't been released yet, according to the article. You should probably wait until they release even a hint of what the patent restrictions will be before criticizing them.
Fine print may have been the wrong terminology, but the fact of the matter still remains that some of these are patented protocols which will require patent licenses to use the protocols. Don't forget that Microsoft is trying to court the OSS community here. It's a move against Red Hat and IBM and others who benefit from the community work that haven't signed patent agreements with Microsoft.
From the article:
In June, Microsoft will also publish a list of the protocols that are covered by patents, and will make available a patent map containing a list of the specific Microsoft patents and patent applications that cover each protocol, when the final version of the protocols are available, Robertson said.
The company will also release the final patent pricing and licensing terms at that time. “As we work over the coming months on feedback on the protocols themselves, we are also going to be completing the patent map for each of these protocols,” Robertson said.






Member since:
2005-07-06
That fine print hasn't been released yet, according to the article. You should probably wait until they release even a hint of what the patent restrictions will be before criticizing them.