Linked by David Adams on Tue 8th Apr 2008 16:33 UTC
BSD and Darwin derivatives "I am very happy about the direction in which the Mac OS X GUI is going, although sadly many Mac users aren't interested in (or don't know about) the "lower levels" of the Macintosh Operating System. Have you ever wondered why the Terminal greets you with the words "Welcome to Darwin"? Why do BSD and Mac OS share certain bits of code? Why does Wikipedia describe Mac OS X as a graphical operating system? Today we're going to take a look at the underlying open source technology which powers your fancy Leopard OS - the hidden core set of components, named Darwin."
Thread beginning with comment 308768
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: What BSD could have been
by kernpanic on Tue 8th Apr 2008 22:20 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: What BSD could have been"
Member since:

The Nick Piggin benchmarks are outdated too. From Jeff's blog:

"We tracked down our problem with the performance drop above 30 threads on Nick Piggin's mysql benchmark to conservative settings for the pthread adaptive spinning. We see a big gain relative to where we were before. Frankly at this point we're splitting hairs with linux and I don't really care where we stand. We had a tremendous problem and we resolved it. Time to move on.."

The only thing that shows FreeBSD performance clearly ahead of Linux is with pipes- yeah I know, its hardly something that will make a Datacentre manager start ripping out his Linux boxes and replace them with FreeBSD ;)

Reply Parent Score: 5