Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 14th Apr 2008 21:44 UTC
The website of a Miami-based networking and security solutions reseller became inaccessible Monday, shortly after the company began advertising an unauthorized Mac clone for a fraction of the cost of Apple's cheapest system. Dubbed OpenMac, the USD 400 offering from Psystar Corporation is described as 'a low-cost high-performance computing platform' based on the ongoing OSX86Project - a hacker-based initiative aimed at maintaining a version of the Mac OS X operating system for everyday PCs. The website is back online now, and the machine has been renamed to Open Computer. Update: Psystar says they will continue to sell the Open Computer system, despite the fact that it appears to violate Apple's EULA. "We're not breaking any laws," they insisted.
Thread beginning with comment 309590
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2008-03-13
RE[5]: Cease and Desist
by the_thunderbird on Tue 15th Apr 2008 13:43
in reply to "RE[4]: Cease and Desist"
Member since:2005-08-19
RE[6]: Cease and Desist
by Vinegar Joe on Tue 15th Apr 2008 14:09
in reply to "RE[5]: Cease and Desist"
Member since:2006-08-16
Where the heck did you get the idea that Apple makes most of it's money from the iPod and iTunes?
Most of it's money comes from Macs and always has come from Macs.
Most of it's money comes from Macs and always has come from Macs.
From 2006:
"Apple's music-related business accounted for 59 percent of the company's total revenue and was up 145 percent compared to same period a year ago."
http://www.mp3.com/stories/2946.html
RE[6]: Cease and Desist
by Johann Chua on Wed 16th Apr 2008 04:41
in reply to "RE[5]: Cease and Desist"
Member since:2005-07-22
Member since:
2006-03-28
The OS sells Macs, but recently, Apple has been making the majority of it's revenue from iPod+iTunes sales. It probably wouldn't affect them much to "allow" people to install OS X on third-party systems. This is especially true given the fact that most people that buy Macs in recent years do so more as a fashion statement than anything else.
That said, Apple has the right to create their OS in such a way that it is difficult to install on third-party hardware. However, I as the purchaser of the software have the right (see quote from Title 17 section 117 of the US Code below) to modify that software in order to run it on a computer.
"it is not an infringement for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the making of another copy or adaptation of that computer program provided that such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine"
Link: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/usc_sec_17_00000117----000-.h...