Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 15th Apr 2008 20:07 UTC, submitted by Moochman
Thread beginning with comment 309821
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: RAID SATA support still not there
by Kebabbert on Wed 16th Apr 2008 08:48
in reply to "RAID SATA support still not there"
I dont understand why you want you use your RAID controller? ZFS doesnt require RAID controller. ZFS can also fix problem that hardware raid can not handle. I trust ZFS more than a hardware raid.
ZFS detects errors within a few hours
http://blogs.sun.com/elowe/entry/zfs_saves_the_day_ta
ZFS can guarantee stuff no other can guarantee
http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/zfs_end_to_end_data
RE[2]: RAID SATA support still not there
by Soulbender on Wed 16th Apr 2008 09:44
in reply to "RE: RAID SATA support still not there"
RE[2]: RAID SATA support still not there
by Weeman on Wed 16th Apr 2008 10:23
in reply to "RE: RAID SATA support still not there"
I dont understand why you want you use your RAID controller? ZFS doesnt require RAID controller. ZFS can also fix problem that hardware raid can not handle. I trust ZFS more than a hardware raid.
ZFS fixed my desync 500GB mirror in under 13 seconds. Try that with a traditional RAID-1.
RE[2]: RAID SATA support still not there
by dizzey on Wed 16th Apr 2008 10:28
in reply to "RE: RAID SATA support still not there"
RE[2]: RAID SATA support still not there
by moondevil on Wed 16th Apr 2008 10:31
in reply to "RE: RAID SATA support still not there"






Member since:
2005-07-08
I really would like to have Solaris on my laptop but it still doesn't support SATA RAID controllers like the VIA VT6421.
The only way to use them under Solaris is to do a BIOS emulation configuration that my BIOS doesn't support.
So I keep on waiting for the day Solaris supports my controller. All other OS are quite happy with it.
--
Paulo