Linked by David Adams on Wed 16th Apr 2008 15:33 UTC, submitted by Hakime
Thread beginning with comment 309892
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Actually, you would probably need to hire unix guys, which are typically expensive. And they would probably have some trouble, as noone really has experience with large scale mac deployments. Not only that, but it is easier to have one team with the skillset to manage 200 machines then two teams managing 100 each.
I think it has alot more to do with what he says in the intro, that they are seeing alot of people coming in who are more comfortable on macs and are asking for them.






Member since:
2005-06-29
Because maybe support is cheaper? Not saying one way or another, just that if it is a significant cost saving there, that could be reason to switch.
Hypothetically
IT staff of 5 maintaining 100 windows comps = $400,000
if they could do 2 IT staff for 100 macs = $160,000
seems reason enough to me, assuming everything else worked just as well